NSTF - Awards Management System - Demo Script
NSTF Awards Management System - Demo Script
Section titled “NSTF Awards Management System - Demo Script”Pre-Demo Checklist
Section titled “Pre-Demo Checklist”Technical Preparation
Section titled “Technical Preparation”- Demo environment loaded with sample NSTF awards data
- Test nomination submissions (3-4 sample nominees across categories)
- Adjudicator panel accounts created (sample judges)
- Admin dashboard populated with realistic data
- Internet connection stable
- Screen sharing software tested
- Backup demo video ready (if live demo fails)
Audience Preparation
Section titled “Audience Preparation”- Understand who’s attending (Executive Director, Awards Manager, IT, Finance?)
- Confirm their current pain points (from discovery call)
- Prepare relevant examples (NSTF awards categories, real scenarios)
- Have pricing options ready (if requested)
- Prepare Q&A responses (see Objection Handling Guide)
Materials Ready
Section titled “Materials Ready”- Demo script (this document)
- One-pager executive summary
- Pricing options sheet
- Implementation timeline
- Reference customer stories (MGSLG, SACE if applicable)
Demo Flow Structure (30-45 Minutes)
Section titled “Demo Flow Structure (30-45 Minutes)”| Section | Duration | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Opening & Context Setting | 3-5 min | Align on pain points, set expectations |
| 2. Nominator Experience | 8-10 min | Show user-friendly submission process |
| 3. Adjudicator Interface | 8-10 min | Demonstrate panel review and scoring |
| 4. Admin Dashboard | 8-10 min | Highlight management and analytics |
| 5. Integration & Automation | 3-5 min | Show Everlytic, email workflows |
| 6. Q&A & Next Steps | 5-10 min | Address questions, discuss timeline |
Section 1: Opening & Context Setting (3-5 Minutes)
Section titled “Section 1: Opening & Context Setting (3-5 Minutes)”Welcome & Agenda
Section titled “Welcome & Agenda”Script:
“Thank you for taking the time to see how we can transform the NSTF awards process. Over the next 30-45 minutes, I’ll walk you through a platform specifically designed for the ‘Science Oscars of South Africa’ - addressing the challenges we discussed: the two-stage manual process, email-based submissions, and what NSTF describes as the ‘arduous undertaking’ of managing nominations.”
“I’ll show you three perspectives: what nominators see, how adjudicators review submissions, and the admin view that gives you complete control and insights. Feel free to stop me anytime with questions.”
Pain Point Validation
Section titled “Pain Point Validation”Script:
“Just to confirm we’re aligned - your current process involves an online registration form, followed by emailing completed nomination documents, manual data entry, and significant back-and-forth during the December-January office closure period. You also mentioned wanting better analytics on nomination trends and diversity. Is that still accurate, or has anything changed?”
[Wait for confirmation/additions]
Why This Matters:
- Establishes you understand their world
- Gets buy-in that solving these pain points is valuable
- Allows them to add any new concerns
Section 2: Nominator Experience (8-10 Minutes)
Section titled “Section 2: Nominator Experience (8-10 Minutes)”2A: Discovery & Getting Started
Section titled “2A: Discovery & Getting Started”Screen: NSTF Awards public landing page
Script:
“Let’s start where your nominators start. They visit the NSTF Awards page - which can be on your existing website or a custom subdomain like awards.nstf.org.za.”
Show:
- Clean, branded landing page (NSTF logo, South32 partnership branding)
- Clear categories (individual awards, organizational awards, special theme award)
- Key dates prominently displayed
- “Start Nomination” button
Talking Points:
- “Fully branded to match NSTF identity - this looks like NSTF, not a third-party tool”
- “Categories clearly explained with eligibility criteria right here - reduces unqualified nominations”
- “Timeline visible upfront - nominators know exactly what to expect”
2B: Single-Stage Integrated Submission
Section titled “2B: Single-Stage Integrated Submission”Screen: Nomination form (live walkthrough)
Script:
“Here’s where we fundamentally change the experience. Instead of your current two-stage process - register, then email documents - this is a single, integrated submission.”
Demonstrate (Live Form Fill):
Step 1: Category Selection
- Dropdown: Select award category (e.g., “NSTF-South32 Award: Research Capacity Development”)
- Auto-populates relevant fields based on category
Step 2: Nominee Information
- Name, affiliation, contact details
- “Notice it auto-saves as they type - if they lose connection, nothing is lost”
Step 3: Nominator Information
- Who is submitting (can be self-nomination or third-party)
- Conflict of interest declaration checkbox
Step 4: Nomination Motivation
- Rich text editor (formatting, bullet points, bold/italics)
- Character/word count visible (if limits apply)
- “They can write directly here, or paste from Word - formatting is preserved”
Step 5: Supporting Documents
- Drag-and-drop file upload
- Show: Upload a sample CV PDF
- “Multiple files supported: CVs, publications, letters of support, images”
- File size limits clearly displayed
- Virus scanning automatic
Step 6: Review & Submit
- Summary page showing all entered information
- “Confirm and submit” button
- Click submit
Confirmation Screen:
- “Thank you! Your nomination has been received.”
- Reference number displayed (e.g., “NSTF-2025-RCD-042”)
- Automated email confirmation sent (show email in inbox)
- Status tracking link (“Check your nomination status anytime”)
Talking Points:
- “This is what NSTF described as ‘arduous’ - now it’s 15-20 minutes, not hours of document preparation”
- “Files stay organized - no digging through email attachments”
- “Nominators get instant confirmation - they know you received it”
- “Reference number for all future communication - no more ‘did you get my email?’ inquiries”
2C: Nominator Self-Service
Section titled “2C: Nominator Self-Service”Screen: Nomination status portal
Script:
“Here’s a bonus feature - nominators can check their status anytime, without emailing your team.”
Show:
- Enter reference number + email
- Dashboard shows:
- ✅ Submission received (Feb 15, 2025)
- ⏳ Under review by adjudication panel
- ⏱️ Shortlist announcement (Expected: May 2025)
- ⏱️ Winner announcement (Expected: August 2025)
Talking Points:
- “Reduces ‘Where’s my nomination?’ emails by 80%”
- “Transparent process builds trust”
- “You control what stages are visible (no need to show internal deliberations)“
Section 3: Adjudicator Interface (8-10 Minutes)
Section titled “Section 3: Adjudicator Interface (8-10 Minutes)”3A: Panel Member Login & Dashboard
Section titled “3A: Panel Member Login & Dashboard”Screen: Adjudicator dashboard
Script:
“Now let’s see the adjudicator experience. Your panel members log in with secure credentials - they can be anywhere in the world, reviewing on their schedule.”
Show:
- Personalized welcome: “Welcome, Prof. [Name] - NSTF Awards Adjudication Panel 2025/2026”
- Assigned nominations dashboard:
- Category: Research Capacity Development (12 nominations assigned)
- Category: Engineering Achievements (8 nominations assigned)
- Deadlines clearly visible
- Conflict of interest declarations logged
Talking Points:
- “Panel members only see nominations in their assigned categories - no information overload”
- “Deadlines front and center - they know when reviews are due”
- “Conflict of interest management built-in - if they know a nominee, they can flag it”
3B: Reviewing a Nomination
Section titled “3B: Reviewing a Nomination”Screen: Nomination review page
Script:
“Let’s open a nomination and see what the review process looks like.”
Show:
- Full nomination details displayed (all fields nominators entered)
- Supporting documents accessible (click to view PDF in-browser)
- Scoring rubric (customizable based on NSTF criteria):
- Example criteria:
- Scientific Excellence (1-10 points)
- Impact & Innovation (1-10 points)
- Capacity Development (1-10 points)
- Diversity & Inclusion (1-5 points)
- Total: /35 points
- Example criteria:
Demonstrate Scoring:
- Select score for each criterion
- Add comments/notes (private to adjudicator, or shared with panel - configurable)
- Attach additional documents (panel members can upload reference materials)
- Click “Save Progress” - can return later
- Click “Submit Review” - locks in scores
Show: Panel Collaboration (Optional Feature)
- If enabled, panel members can see aggregate scores (anonymized or attributed)
- Discussion thread for borderline cases
- “This is configurable - some panels prefer blind scoring, others collaborate”
Talking Points:
- “No more printing 50-page nomination documents”
- “Panel members work at their pace - no scheduling nightmares for in-person meetings”
- “Scoring is structured and consistent - easier to compare nominees objectively”
- “Discussion threads reduce back-and-forth emails”
3C: Conflict of Interest & Ethics
Section titled “3C: Conflict of Interest & Ethics”Screen: Conflict declaration workflow
Script:
“Academic and professional communities are small - conflicts happen. Here’s how we handle it.”
Show:
- Adjudicator sees nomination, recognizes nominee
- Clicks “Declare Conflict of Interest”
- Workflow triggered:
- Nomination automatically reassigned to another panel member
- Admin notified
- Adjudicator can’t access that nomination anymore
- Audit trail maintained
Talking Points:
- “Ethics and transparency built-in”
- “Automated reassignment - no awkward conversations”
- “Full audit trail for governance and accountability”
Section 4: Admin Dashboard (8-10 Minutes)
Section titled “Section 4: Admin Dashboard (8-10 Minutes)”4A: Administrator Overview
Section titled “4A: Administrator Overview”Screen: Admin dashboard (bird’s-eye view)
Script:
“This is the nerve center - where NSTF staff manage the entire awards program.”
Show:
- Key Metrics (Dashboard Widgets):
- Total Nominations: 87
- By Category breakdown (bar chart)
- Submission Timeline (line graph showing daily submissions)
- Adjudication Progress: 65% complete
- Geography: Provinces represented (map visual if applicable)
- Diversity Metrics: Gender, race, institution type
Talking Points:
- “This is what you don’t have today - real-time insights into the awards program”
- “No more manually counting spreadsheet rows”
- “Board meetings and funder reports become 10-minute tasks, not day-long exercises”
4B: Managing Nominations
Section titled “4B: Managing Nominations”Screen: Nominations list view
Script:
“Here’s every nomination in one place - searchable, filterable, exportable.”
Demonstrate:
- Filter by category: Show only “Research Capacity Development” nominations
- Search by keyword: Type “University of Cape Town” - shows all UCT-affiliated nominees
- Sort by submission date: See recent submissions first
- Bulk actions:
- Select multiple nominations
- Assign to adjudicator panel
- Export to Excel/PDF (for offline review if needed)
- Send bulk communication (e.g., “Thank you, your nomination is under review”)
Click into a nomination:
- Full details visible
- Edit capability (if nominator made a mistake, NSTF can correct)
- Timeline showing all actions (submitted, assigned, reviewed, shortlisted, etc.)
- Communication log (all emails sent to nominator)
Talking Points:
- “Complete control and visibility”
- “No more digging through email folders to find a nomination”
- “Bulk actions save hours during high-volume periods”
4C: Adjudication Management
Section titled “4C: Adjudication Management”Screen: Panel management view
Script:
“Managing your adjudication panel is simplified here.”
Show:
- Panel Members List:
- Name, affiliation, expertise areas, assigned categories
- Review progress (e.g., “Prof. Smith: 8/12 reviews complete”)
- Last login date
Demonstrate:
- Add new panel member: Form to invite (auto-sends login credentials)
- Assign nominations: Drag-and-drop or bulk assign
- Send reminders: “Prof. Smith, 4 reviews pending - deadline in 7 days”
- Download scores: Export all adjudicator scores to Excel for shortlisting discussions
Talking Points:
- “Panel management is automated - invite, assign, remind, track”
- “No more chasing panel members via email - system sends automated reminders”
- “Export scores for your shortlisting meetings - all data in one place”
4D: Awards Lifecycle Management
Section titled “4D: Awards Lifecycle Management”Screen: Workflow stages
Script:
“The awards program has clear stages - the platform manages the transitions.”
Show Workflow:
- Registration Open (Nov 4 - Jan 29)
- Full Submissions Due (March 5)
- Adjudication (March - May)
- Shortlisting (May)
- Winner Selection (June)
- Announcement (August - Awards Ceremony)
Demonstrate:
- Status changes: Move a nomination from “Under Review” to “Shortlisted”
- Automated notifications: Nominator receives email “Congratulations! Shortlisted for NSTF Award”
- Winner announcement: Select winners, system generates winner certificates, media release content
Talking Points:
- “You control the timeline - system enforces deadlines and automates transitions”
- “Nominators stay informed at every stage - builds anticipation and engagement”
- “Winner announcement is one click - certificates, media content, website updates all prepared”
4E: Analytics & Reporting
Section titled “4E: Analytics & Reporting”Screen: Advanced reports
Script:
“Let’s look at analytics - this is where the platform becomes strategic, not just operational.”
Show Reports:
Report 1: Diversity & Inclusion Analysis
- Gender breakdown (nominees, winners over time)
- Racial demographics
- Geographic distribution (provinces, urban vs. rural)
- Institution types (universities, private sector, government, NGO)
- “Track progress on diversity goals, inform future outreach”
Report 2: Nomination Trends
- Year-over-year growth by category
- Which categories attract most nominations (inform resource allocation)
- Submission timing (do most submit last-minute? Inform reminder campaigns)
Report 3: Adjudication Quality
- Inter-rater reliability (do panel members score consistently?)
- Average review completion time
- Identify categories needing more panel members
Report 4: Funder Reporting
- “For South32 partnership or other sponsors - show program reach and impact”
- Exportable to PDF/PowerPoint for board presentations
Talking Points:
- “This data helps NSTF make strategic decisions - where to focus outreach, which categories need promotion”
- “Funder reporting becomes effortless - South32 wants impact metrics? Done.”
- “Diversity tracking ensures NSTF awards reflect South Africa’s talent pool”
Section 5: Integration & Automation (3-5 Minutes)
Section titled “Section 5: Integration & Automation (3-5 Minutes)”5A: Everlytic Integration
Section titled “5A: Everlytic Integration”Screen: Email campaign automation
Script:
“You mentioned using Everlytic for communications. We integrate seamlessly.”
Show:
- Nomination submission triggers Everlytic workflow
- Automated email sequences:
- Confirmation email (instant)
- Reminder email if submission incomplete (3 days before deadline)
- Status update emails (shortlist, winner announcement)
- Example: “When a winner is selected, Everlytic automatically sends congratulations email with personalized certificate attached”
Talking Points:
- “We don’t replace Everlytic - we enhance it”
- “Automation reduces manual email campaigns from hours to minutes”
- “Personalized communications at scale (hundreds of nominators, customized messages)“
5B: Website & Database Integration
Section titled “5B: Website & Database Integration”Screen: Integration architecture diagram (optional)
Script:
- “Awards page embeds into your existing NSTF website - no separate platform feel”
- “Data syncs with your NSTF database - nominees/winners added to your CRM automatically”
- “API available for future integrations (if you add other systems)”
Talking Points:
- “Seamless experience - nominators don’t feel like they’re on a different platform”
- “Data lives where you need it - not siloed in a separate tool”
Section 6: Q&A & Next Steps (5-10 Minutes)
Section titled “Section 6: Q&A & Next Steps (5-10 Minutes)”Anticipated Questions (Have Answers Ready)
Section titled “Anticipated Questions (Have Answers Ready)”Q: “How long to implement?” A: “8 weeks for pilot (core features), 12 weeks for comprehensive system. We can target November 2025 awards cycle if we start by Q1 2025.”
Q: “What if nominators struggle with technology?” A: “The interface is simpler than email attachments. We provide video tutorials, and NSTF help desk can assist (we train your team). In trials, 95%+ users complete without support.”
Q: “What happens to historical data?” A: “We migrate previous years’ nominees and winners - creates a historical archive. You can showcase past winners and analyze trends.”
Q: “What if we want changes mid-project?” A: “Agile process - we show you progress weekly, you provide feedback. Minor changes are included, major scope shifts are discussed (may affect timeline/cost).”
Q: “Ongoing costs?” A: “R50K-R80K annually covers hosting, security updates, and support. Much less than staff time saved (60-70% admin reduction).”
Call to Action
Section titled “Call to Action”Script:
“Based on what you’ve seen, does this address the ‘arduous process’ you’ve experienced?”
[Wait for response]
If positive:
“Great! Here are the next steps I recommend:”
- “I’ll send you a detailed proposal with pricing options (pilot vs. comprehensive)”
- “We schedule a 60-minute requirements session - dive deeper into NSTF-specific needs”
- “Target decision by [date] to start implementation for Nov 2025 cycle” “Does that timeline work for your planning?”
If hesitant:
“What concerns or questions do you still have? I want to make sure this is the right fit for NSTF.”
[Address objections - see Objection Handling Guide]
Demo Best Practices
Section titled “Demo Best Practices”✅ Tell stories: “Imagine it’s 11pm, Dec 23, someone submits a nomination - instead of waiting until Jan 7 for your office to reopen, they get instant confirmation” ✅ Show real data: Use NSTF award categories, realistic nominee names (with permission or anonymized) ✅ Pause for questions: Don’t rush - engagement is more important than finishing on time ✅ Customize: Reference their specific pain points (“You mentioned the challenge of office closures - here’s how we solve that”) ✅ Demonstrate value, not features: “This saves your team 15 hours per awards cycle” not “This button exports to CSV”
Don’ts:
Section titled “Don’ts:”❌ Don’t show bugs: Test demo environment thoroughly beforehand ❌ Don’t get technical: Save architecture diagrams for IT stakeholders, focus on user experience ❌ Don’t oversell: If a feature isn’t ready, say “We can add that” not “We already do that” ❌ Don’t ignore the room: If someone looks confused, stop and check understanding ❌ Don’t skip Q&A: Even if time is short, answer questions - that’s where deals are made
Post-Demo Follow-Up
Section titled “Post-Demo Follow-Up”Within 24 Hours:
Section titled “Within 24 Hours:”- Send thank-you email
- Attach demo recording (if recorded)
- Include one-pager executive summary
- Provide pricing options document
- Suggest next meeting (requirements session)
Within 1 Week:
Section titled “Within 1 Week:”- Follow up if no response
- Offer to demo for additional stakeholders (Board, IT, Finance)
- Provide customer references (if requested)
Demo Script Owner: iSu Technologies Sales Team Last Updated: December 2, 2025 Next Review: After first 3 NSTF demos (incorporate learnings)